1. What’s important to you in our local work?
Our priorities remain as set in 2017 and have guided what we’ve done, but this year, food security is a big concern and so can be a high priority. We should focus on what is falling through the cracks, working with organizations that are struggling, doing things that will really make a difference, needs not wants. Consider projects such as the arts (providing musical instruments) or putting kitchens, fridges, and stoves in schools. Stress close relationships with Rotary and its themes.
2. Should we continue our Community Service Project Grants? If so, should we resume this fall?
Although one person suggested cancelling the program, there was consensus to go ahead, but with improvements in connecting with the organizations and projects we fund. It’s difficult to keep track of 7 or 8 recipients each fall and spring. Consider a more focused approach. Funding is our way to open the door to get involved in community service. Connection with the people involved is important. People from organizations whose projects we support should speak to our club, including before we decide to work with them. We could consider one grant offering per year and one big project that we choose. Don’t give grants to large organizations that have many funding sources (see what United Way funds: https://www.unitedwaykfla.ca/grants/). Concerning repeat funding, ask previous recipients to report on accomplishments, allowing discussion with the club on what further funding would do. Possibly have two categories; new and prior. We have had a close relationship with The Mess, but it now is self-sustaining, with its own fund-raisers and corporate sponsors. Such an organization does not need our help as much as some others.
3. Is collaboration with other clubs or other organizations important? In what form?
Do our own thing, but collaborate as needed. Don’t do a joint grants program. Make good use of District and RI funds, as we’re doing with the Rotary FAR mentorship program.
4. Should we give priority to projects that provide hands-on opportunities for direct participation by members?
General consensus that we should enhance this emphasis; it brings great satisfaction.
5. Should we continue to fund only projects not programs (specific initiatives not baseline funding)?
Not discussed much, but there seemed to be consensus on continuing this approach.
6. Are there cases where we should couple fundraising explicitly to a project?
This is not our usual practice, but one person was not averse to joining another organization in a project that included some fundraising related to it. If we partner with an organization that has charitable status, we could work through Canada Helps in fundraising.
7. Should we offer funding only if we have one or more champions of the project from club?
Several people commented on the importance of having a champion for each project, to keep in touch with the partner organization and the work, and to keep the club informed.
9. What projects or service activities should we undertake that require no funding?
Volunteering at Robinson Community Gardens is a good example of this.
10. Other Comments
Focused projects enable accountability and showing our partners we are genuinely interested in what they are doing.
An important criterion in deciding what projects to undertake, as has been the case in our international work, is having strong, sustained relationships with our partners.